Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, Volumen 49, número 147, diciembre 2017
Enunciados no comprometidos y punto de vista jurídico: una perspectiva renovada
[Detached Legal Statements and Legal Point of View: A Renewed Perspective]
Diego Dei Vecchi
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM)
Departamento Académico de Derecho

deivecchidm@gmail.com

Resumen: The author calls into question the possibility of a legal science in accordance with the requirements of normative legal positivism, which holds that to describe the law is to give an account of legal rights and duties. To evaluate the possibility of this program the author reformulates Joseph Raz’s thesis which states that legal scientists must adopt the legal point of view; to this end they must proffer statements of a peculiar type, which Raz has called detached legal statements. This paper attempts to show that even though the thesis can be rejected as Raz postulates it, this would risk discarding as “non-problematic” more than what is reasonable to discard. Thus, resorting to two familiar discussions in the philosophy of law, the “legal point of view thesis” is reformulated and shown as plausible.
Palabras clave: legal science, legal positivism, legal statements, norm proposition, neutrality

Resumen en español | PDF en inglés (126 Kb)