The Automatic and the Incomplete. Remarks on Recanati’s Literal Meaning
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this essay, I focus on Recanati’s treatment of ‘What is said’ in his book Literal Meaning. I discuss Recanati’s conception of Minimalism, his views on propositional completeness, and his understanding of the processes governing the semantic interpretation of meaning-controlled contextuality. In the final sections, I draw some conclusions pertaining to Recanati’s assessment of the interface between pragmatic and semantic processes.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Predelli, S. (2018). The Automatic and the Incomplete. Remarks on Recanati’s Literal Meaning. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana De Filosofía, 38(112), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2006.465
PLUMX Metrics
Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica.