Calculation, Bookkeeping, Representation, and Explanation: A Parable
Main Article Content
Abstract
Our topic is a basic discussion of what it is to regard a bit of mathematics as referring to something physical, and the different options one has for explaining —and hence rendering non-miraculous— the empirical success of a mathematical formalism. In order to strip away as much extraneous distraction as possible, we will leave the particular case of the wavefunction in quantum theory aside and tell a simpler tale. A fairy tale, in fact. The aim is to foreground some possible relations between a mathematical formalism and the physical system it is used to represent.
Downloads
Article Details
PLUMX Metrics
References
Harlow, Daniel, 2016, “The Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information”, Review of Modern Physics, vol. 88, no. 1, 15002.
Hiley, B.J. and F. David Peat (eds.), 1987, Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Maudlin, Tim, 2018, “Ontological Clarity via Canonical Presentation: Electromagnetism and the Aharonov–Bohm Effect”, Entropy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 465–486.
Putnam, Hilary, 1975, Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tegmark, Max, 2014, Our Mathematical Universe, Knopf, New York.
Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica.