Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia, Falibilidad y normatividad: un análisis filosófico de la suerte

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Alfonso Anaya

Resumen

Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia, Falibilidad y normatividad: un análisis filosófico de la suerte, Cátedra, Madrid,  2019, 176 pp.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Cómo citar
Anaya, A. (2020). Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia, Falibilidad y normatividad: un análisis filosófico de la suerte. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana De Filosofía, 52(155), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2020.1195
Sección
Notas Bibliográficas

Citas

Austin, J.L., 1962, Sense and Sensibilia. Reconstructed from the Manuscript Notes by G.J. Warnock, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Descartes, René, 1996, Meditations on First Philosophy. With Selection from the Objections and Replies, trad. John Cottingham, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kalderon, Mark Eli, 2011, “Before the Law”, Philosophical Issues, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 219–244.

McDowell, John, 2013, “Tyler Burge on Disjunctivism (II)”, Philosophical Explorations, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 259–279.

Pryor, James, 2004, “What’s Wrong with Moore’s Argument?”, Philosophical Issues, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 349–378.

Travis, Charles, 2005, “A Sense of Occasion”, Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 55, no. 219, pp. 286–314.

Wright, Crispin, 2007, “The Perils of Dogmatism”, en Nuccetelli y Sead (eds.), Themes from G.E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.