The Looping Effects of Medicalizing Grief

Main Article Content

Alice Elizabeth Kelley
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2432-1561

Abstract

The most recent versions of official psychiatric diagnostic guidelines include a new addition: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD). PGD is controversial due to concerns about harmful looping effects. Some opponents of PGD’s inclusion in the DSM worry that the diagnosis may pathologize normal human experiences and alienate grievers from their grief. This paper argues that these concerns are less troubling than they initially appear (in part because they assume an unhelpful, and conceptually optional, background understanding of health conditions as pathologies) and calls attention to overlooked beneficial looping effects that might be achieved by medicalizing (some) experiences of grief.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kelley, A. E. (2024). The Looping Effects of Medicalizing Grief. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana De Filosofía, 56(167), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2024.1536

PLUMX Metrics

References

American Psychiatric Association, 2013a, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.).

American Psychiatric Association, 2013b, DSM–5 Fact Sheet: Major Depressive Disorder and the Bereavement Exclusion. http://www.psychiatry.org/dsm5

American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM–IV–TR (4th ed.), American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.

Aviv, Rachel, 2022, September 20, Opinion|“Do You Need a ‘Correct Attitude’ to Understand Your Mind?”, The New York Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/20/opinion/us-mental-health-insight.html

Barclay, Craig, 1995, “Autobiographical Remembering: Narrative Constraints on Objectifying Selves”, in David C. Rubin (ed.), Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–125.

Cacciatore, Joanne, and Allen Frances, 2022, “DSM–5–TR Turns Normal Grief into a Mental Disorder”, The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 7, e32.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00150-X

Cholbi, Michael, 2021, Grief: A Philosophical Guide, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

Clayton, Paula J., Lynn Desmarais, and George Winokur, 1968, “A Study of Normal Bereavement”, American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 168–178.

Conway, Martin A., 2003, “Cognitive-Affective Mechanisms and Processes in Autobiographical Memory”, Memory, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 217–224.

Diamond, Cora, 2003, “The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy”, Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–26.

Eich, Eric, Todd C. Handy, Emily A. Holmes, Juval Lerner, and Heather K. McIsaac, 2011, Field and Observer Perspectives in Autobiographical Memory. 14th Sydney Symposium on Social Psychology, University of New South Wales. http://www.sydneysymposium.unsw.edu.au/2011/chapters/EichSSSP2011.pdf

Goldie, Peter, 2012, The Mess Inside: Narrative, Emotion and The Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Hacking, Ian, 1999, The Social Construction of What?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Hensley, Paula L., and Paula J. Clayton, 2013, “Why the Bereavement Exclusion Was Introduced in DSM–III”, Psychiatric Annals, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 256–260.

Hilberdink, Charlotte, Kevin Ghainder, Alexandre Dubanchet, Devon Hinton, A.A.A. Manik J. Djelantik, Brian J. Hall, and Eric Bui, 2023, “Bereavement Issues and Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Global Perspective”, Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, 10, e32. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.28

Kelley, Alice Elizabeth, manuscript, “Grief, Health, and Medicalization”.

Kukla, Quill Rebecca, 2014, “Medicalization, ‘Normal Function’, and the Definition of Health”, in John D. Arras, Rebecca Kukla, and Elizabeth Fenton (eds.), Routledge Philosophy Companions: Routledge Companion to Bioethics, Taylor and Francis, Florence, pp. 515–530.

Lewis, Aubrey, 1934, “The Psychopathology of Insight”, British Journal of Medical Psychology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1934.tb01129.x

Lewis, C.S., 1961, A Grief Observed, Faber and Faber, London.

Loughman, Amy, and Nick Haslam, 2018, “Neuroscientific Explanations and the Stigma of Mental Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Study”, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 3, no. 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0136-1

Maruši´c, Berislav, 2018, “Do Reasons Expire? An Essay on Grief”, Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 18, no. 25.

Moran, Richard, 2015, The Story of My Life: Narrative and Self-Understanding, Marquette University Press, Wisconsin, USA.

Na’Aman, Oded, 2021, “The Rationality of Emotional Change: Toward a Process View”, Noûs, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 245–269.

Shear, M. Katherine, 2012, “Grief and Mourning Gone Awry: Pathway and Course of Complicated Grief”, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–128. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.2/mshear

Shear, M. Katherine, Yuanjia Wang, Natalia Skritskaya, Naihua Duan, Christine Mauro, and Angela Ghesquiere, 2014, “Treatment of Complicated Grief in Elderly Persons: A Randomized Clinical Trial”, JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242

Shear, Katherine, Ellen Frank, Patricia R. Houck, and Charles F. Reynolds, 2005, “Treatment of Complicated Grief: A Randomized Controlled Trial”, JAMA, vol. 293, no. 21, pp. 2601–2608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2601

Tekin, Şerife, 2015, “Against Hyponarrating Grief: Incompatible Research and Treatment Interests in the DSM–5”, in The DSM–5 In Perspective, pp. 179–197.

The Center for Prolonged Grief. The Center for Prolonged Grief-Professionals-Treatment. https://web.archive.org/web/20221006113745/https://prolongedgrief.columbia.edu/for-the-public/complicated-grief-public/therapy/

Wakefield, Jerome C., 2015, “The Loss of Grief: Science and Pseudoscience in the Debate over DSM–5’s Elimination of the Bereavement Exclusion”, in Steeves Demazeux, and Patrick Singy (eds.), The DSM–5 in Perspective. Philosophical Reflections on the Psychiatric Babel, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 157–178.