The Looping Effects of Medicalizing Grief
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las versiones más recientes de las directrices de diagnóstico psiquiátrico incluyen una nueva incorporación: el Trastorno de Duelo Prolongado (TDP). El TDP es controvertido debido a las preocupaciones sobre efectos nocivos de bucle. Algunos opositores a la inclusión del TDP temen que el diagnóstico patologice experiencias humanas normales y aliene a los dolientes de su duelo. Este artículo sostiene que estas preocupaciones son menos graves de lo que parecen inicialmente (en parte porque suponen una comprensión poco útil y opcional de las condiciones de salud como patologías) y señala efectos de bucle beneficiosos que podrían seguirse de medicalizar (algunas) experiencias de duelo.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Métricas de PLUMX
Citas
American Psychiatric Association, 2013a, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.).
American Psychiatric Association, 2013b, DSM–5 Fact Sheet: Major Depressive Disorder and the Bereavement Exclusion. http://www.psychiatry.org/dsm5
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM–IV–TR (4th ed.), American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
Aviv, Rachel, 2022, September 20, Opinion|“Do You Need a ‘Correct Attitude’ to Understand Your Mind?”, The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/20/opinion/us-mental-health-insight.html
Barclay, Craig, 1995, “Autobiographical Remembering: Narrative Constraints on Objectifying Selves”, in David C. Rubin (ed.), Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–125.
Cacciatore, Joanne, and Allen Frances, 2022, “DSM–5–TR Turns Normal Grief into a Mental Disorder”, The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 7, e32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00150-X
Cholbi, Michael, 2021, Grief: A Philosophical Guide, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Clayton, Paula J., Lynn Desmarais, and George Winokur, 1968, “A Study of Normal Bereavement”, American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 168–178.
Conway, Martin A., 2003, “Cognitive-Affective Mechanisms and Processes in Autobiographical Memory”, Memory, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 217–224.
Diamond, Cora, 2003, “The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy”, Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–26.
Eich, Eric, Todd C. Handy, Emily A. Holmes, Juval Lerner, and Heather K. McIsaac, 2011, Field and Observer Perspectives in Autobiographical Memory. 14th Sydney Symposium on Social Psychology, University of New South Wales. http://www.sydneysymposium.unsw.edu.au/2011/chapters/EichSSSP2011.pdf
Goldie, Peter, 2012, The Mess Inside: Narrative, Emotion and The Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hacking, Ian, 1999, The Social Construction of What?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Hensley, Paula L., and Paula J. Clayton, 2013, “Why the Bereavement Exclusion Was Introduced in DSM–III”, Psychiatric Annals, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 256–260.
Hilberdink, Charlotte, Kevin Ghainder, Alexandre Dubanchet, Devon Hinton, A.A.A. Manik J. Djelantik, Brian J. Hall, and Eric Bui, 2023, “Bereavement Issues and Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Global Perspective”, Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, 10, e32. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.28
Kelley, Alice Elizabeth, manuscript, “Grief, Health, and Medicalization”.
Kukla, Quill Rebecca, 2014, “Medicalization, ‘Normal Function’, and the Definition of Health”, in John D. Arras, Rebecca Kukla, and Elizabeth Fenton (eds.), Routledge Philosophy Companions: Routledge Companion to Bioethics, Taylor and Francis, Florence, pp. 515–530.
Lewis, Aubrey, 1934, “The Psychopathology of Insight”, British Journal of Medical Psychology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1934.tb01129.x
Lewis, C.S., 1961, A Grief Observed, Faber and Faber, London.
Loughman, Amy, and Nick Haslam, 2018, “Neuroscientific Explanations and the Stigma of Mental Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Study”, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 3, no. 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0136-1
Maruši´c, Berislav, 2018, “Do Reasons Expire? An Essay on Grief”, Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 18, no. 25.
Moran, Richard, 2015, The Story of My Life: Narrative and Self-Understanding, Marquette University Press, Wisconsin, USA.
Na’Aman, Oded, 2021, “The Rationality of Emotional Change: Toward a Process View”, Noûs, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 245–269.
Shear, M. Katherine, 2012, “Grief and Mourning Gone Awry: Pathway and Course of Complicated Grief”, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–128. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.2/mshear
Shear, M. Katherine, Yuanjia Wang, Natalia Skritskaya, Naihua Duan, Christine Mauro, and Angela Ghesquiere, 2014, “Treatment of Complicated Grief in Elderly Persons: A Randomized Clinical Trial”, JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242
Shear, Katherine, Ellen Frank, Patricia R. Houck, and Charles F. Reynolds, 2005, “Treatment of Complicated Grief: A Randomized Controlled Trial”, JAMA, vol. 293, no. 21, pp. 2601–2608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2601
Tekin, Şerife, 2015, “Against Hyponarrating Grief: Incompatible Research and Treatment Interests in the DSM–5”, in The DSM–5 In Perspective, pp. 179–197.
The Center for Prolonged Grief. The Center for Prolonged Grief-Professionals-Treatment. https://web.archive.org/web/20221006113745/https://prolongedgrief.columbia.edu/for-the-public/complicated-grief-public/therapy/
Wakefield, Jerome C., 2015, “The Loss of Grief: Science and Pseudoscience in the Debate over DSM–5’s Elimination of the Bereavement Exclusion”, in Steeves Demazeux, and Patrick Singy (eds.), The DSM–5 in Perspective. Philosophical Reflections on the Psychiatric Babel, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 157–178.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica.