A Criterion of Literality for Names
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, several kinds of non-referential uses of names have received attention within semantics. However, the lack of a principled basis for drawing the distinction between uses that a semantic theory of names must account for (‘literal’ uses) and other uses that it need not explain by itself (‘non-literal uses’) represents an important deficiency in the debate. A prominent objection (the ‘Sceptic’s Challenge’) against semantic views that treat predicative uses as literal exemplifies the kind of problem that can result from this deficiency. This article proposes a general manner of drawing the line between literal and non-literal uses of names. Further, by providing a rationale for treating predicative uses as literal, it also provides a response to the Sceptic’s Challenge.
Downloads
Article Details
PLUMX Metrics
References
Bach, Kent, 2015, “The Predicate View of Proper Names”, Philosophy Compass, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 772–784. (doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12261)
Bach, Kent, 2002, “Giorgione Was So-Called Because of His Name”, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 16, pp. 73–103. (doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.4)
Boër, Steven E., 1975, “Proper Names as Predicates”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 389–400. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/4318947)
Burge, Tyler, 1973, “Reference and Proper Names”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, no. 14, pp. 425–439. (doi.org/10.2307/2025107)
Crane, Tim, 1992, “Names, Sense and Kripke’s Puzzle”, From the Logical Point of View, vol. 2, pp. 11–26. (Downloaded from (https://philpapers.org/archive/CRANSI.pdf) [accessed 21/10/2025]
Cumming, Samuel,2008,“Variabilism”,The Philosophical Review, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 525–554. (doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2008-015)
Donnellan, Keith S., 1966, “Reference and Definite Descriptions”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 281–304. (doi.org/10.2307/2183143)
Dummett, Michael, 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harper & Row, USA.
Elbourne, Paul, 2005, Situations and Individuals, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Ezcurdia, Maite, and Robert Stainton, 2013, “Introduction to the Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy”, in Maite Ezcurdia and Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy: Broadview Press, pp. xiii–xxxiv. (Downloaded from (https://philpapers.org/archive/EZDITT.pdf) [accessed 21/10/2025]
Fara, Delia Graff, 2015a, “ ‘Literal’ Uses of Proper Names”, in Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference, Oxford University Press, pp. 251–279.(doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714088.003.0013)
Fara, Delia Graff, 2015b, “Names Are Predicates”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 59–117. (doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2812660)
Frege, Gottlob, 1997 [1892], “On Sinn and Bedeutung”, in Michael Beaney (ed.), The Frege Reader, Blackwell, pp. 151–172.
Geurts, Bart, 1997, “Good News about the Description Theory of Names”, Journal of Semantics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 319–348.(doi.org/10.1093/jos/14.4.319)
Gray, Aidan, 2018, “Lexical-Rule Predicativism about Names”, Synthese, vol. 195, no. 12, pp. 5549–5569. (doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1462-4)
Gray, Aidan, 2016, “Minimal Descriptivism”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 343–364. (doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0202-7)
Hawthorne, John, and David Manley, 2012, The Reference Book, Oxford University Press, New York. (doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693672.001.0001)
Hesse, Jacob, Chris Genovesi, and Eros Corazza, 2023, “Metaphorical Uses of Proper Names and the Continuity Hypothesis”, Journal of Semantics, vol. 40, no. 2–3, pp. 235–264. (doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffad006)
Hornsby, Jennifer, 1976, “Proper Names: A Defence of Burge”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 227–234. (doi.org/10.1007/BF00372494)
Jeshion, Robin, 2017, “ ‘The’ Problem for the-Predicativism”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 219–240. (doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3772008)
Jeshion, Robin, 2015a, “A Rejoinder to Fara’s ‘ “Literal” Uses of Proper Names’ ”, in Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 280–294. (doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714088.003.0014)
Jeshion, Robin, 2015b, “Names Not Predicates”, in Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference, Oxford University Press, pp. 225–250. (doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714088.003.0012)
Jeshion, Robin, 2015c, “Referentialism and Predicativism about Proper Names”, Erkenntnis, vol. 80, pp. 363–404. (doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9700-3)
Kripke, Saul A., 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Kripke, Saul A., 1977, “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 255–276. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x)
Leckie, Gail, 2013, “The Double Life of Names”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 1139–1160. (doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0008-3)
Lee, Junhyo, 2020, “On the Asymmetry between Names and Count Nouns: Syntactic Arguments against Predicativism”, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 277–301. (doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09273-8)
Mahant, Nikhil, 2022a, Names are Words, Dissertation: Central European University. (https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2022/mahant_nikhil.pdf)
Mahant, Nikhil, 2022b, “The Metaphysical Burden of Millianism”, Synthese, vol. 200, no. 4, p. 293. (doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03754-3)
Marcus, Ruth Barcan, 1961, “Modalities and Intensional Languages”, Synthese, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 303–322. (doi.org/10.1007/BF00486629)
Matushansky, Ora, 2015, “The Other Francis Bacon: On Non-BARE Proper Names”, Erkenntnis (1975–), vol. 80, supp. 2, pp. 335–362. (doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9703-0)
Michaelson, Eliot, 2023, “Unspeakable Names”, Synthese, vol. 201, no. 2, p. 66. (doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04038-0)
Mill, John Stuart, 1843, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Cambridge University Press, New York. (doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139149839)
Nunberg, Geoffrey, 1995, “Transfers of Meaning”, Journal of Semantics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 109–132. (doi.org/10.1093/jos/12.2.109)
Perry, John, 1977, “Frege on Demonstratives”, Philosophical Review, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 474–497. (doi.org/10.2307/2184564)
Rami, Dolf, 2022, Names and Context, Bloomsbury Publishing, New York. (doi.org/10.5040/9781350180659)
Rami, Dolf, 2015, “The Multiple Uses of Proper Nouns”, Erkenntnis (1975–), vol. 80, supp. 2, pp. 405–432. (doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9704-z)
Russell, Bertrand, 1911, “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108–128. (doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108)
Sawyer, Sarah, 2010, “The Modified Predicate Theory of Proper Names”, in Sarah Sawyer (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Language, Palgrave
Macmillan, United Kingdom, pp. 206–225. (doi.org/10.1057/9780230248588_11)
Schoubye, Anders J., 2020, “Names Are Variables”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 53–94. (doi.org/10.1215/00318108-7890468)
Schoubye, Anders J., 2017, “Type-Ambiguous Names”, Mind, vol. 126, no. 503, pp. 715–767. (doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv188)
Soames, Scott, 2002, Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford University Press, Oxford. (doi.org/10.1093/0195145283.001.0001)
Szabo, Zoltan Gendler, 2006, “The Distinction between Semantics and Pragmatics”, in Ernest Lepore and Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford
Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 361–389. (doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0017)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica.