Justificación, normatividad e historia: sobre la idea de rememoración en A Spirit of Trust
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to make explicit an explanatory strategy that lies at the core of Robert Brandom’s A Spirit of Trust. This strategy consists, according to our reading, in treating the epistemological opposition between appearances and reality —and other related conceptual oppositions— as an internal, normative and historical distinction. We will show how Brandom employs the procedure of recollections to make this strategy work: by situating different representations in a sequence of historical development, recollections allow us to understand the distinction between appearances and reality as the distinction between how things are for us and how they ought to be for us.
Downloads
Article Details
PLUMX Metrics
References
Bouché, Gilles, 2020, “A Pure Philosophy of Language with an Edifying Intent: Brandom’s Reply to Rorty”, en Gilles Bouché (ed.), Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 166–183.
Brandom, Robert B., 2019, A Spirit of Trust, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambrige, MA.
Brandom, Robert B., 2014, “A Hegelian Model of Legal Concept Determination: The Normative Fine Structure of the Judges’ Chain Novel”, en Graham Hubbs, y Douglas Lind (eds.), Pragmatism, Law and Language, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 19–39.
Brandom, Robert B., 2013, “Reason, Genealogy, and the Hermeneutics of Magnanimity”, disponible en la página electrónica del autor: https://bit.ly/41GMw01 [última consulta: 3/3/2023].
Brandom, Robert B., 2009, Reason in Philosophy, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 27–108.
Brandom, Robert B., 2002, Tales of the Mighty Dead, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Brandom, Robert B., 1994, Making it Explicit, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. deVries, Willem A., 2021, “Brandom and A Spirit of Trust”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 236–250.
Ficara, Elena, 2020, “Truth and Incompatibility”, en Gilles Bouché (ed.), Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 29–40.
Giromini, José, 2014, “Language and Rules: A Normative Approach to the Myth of the Given”, TAULA, vol. 46, pp. 17–26.
Honneth, Axel, 2021, “Demoralizing Recognition: Comments on R. Brandom, A Spirit of Trust”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 714–721.
Knappik, Franz, 2020, “Brandom on Postmodern Ethical Life: Moral and Political Problems”, en Gilles Bouché (ed.), Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 184–197.
McDowell, John, 2021, “Notes on A Spirit of Trust”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 722–727.
McDowell, John, 1994, Mind and World, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Moyar, Dean, 2020, “Intentional Agency and Conceptual Idealism: Brandom on Hegelian Reason”, en Gilles Bouché (ed.), Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 87–104.
Pinkard, Terry, 2020, “A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology, by Robert Brandom”, Mind, vol. 129, no. 515, pp. 990–999.
Pippin, Robert B., 2021, “ ‘All for One and One for All’: Robert Brandom’s A Spirit of Trust”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 728–733.
Redding, Paul, 2020, “The Possibility of a Semantic Interpretation of Hegel’s Conception of Consciousness”, en Gilles Bouché (ed.), Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 56–74.
Sellars, Wilfrid, 1963, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”, en Science Perception and Reality, Ridgeview, Atascadero, pp. 127–196.
Stern, Robert, 2021, “In the Spirit of Hegel?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 734–740.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica.